|
Saromatae (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
Agreed do it now! But you know the strategy will be, wait until everyone forgets so they can say "well it wasn't really like that" and deny everything.
cffalk (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
why are there not hearings about fannie and freddie, RIGHT NOW! not after the election, but right NOW! when the truth comes out heads are going to roll, and many of those heads will be democrats, could that be the reason why there is no investigation going on today.......i think so
Kras3169 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
It's not even just socialism for the rich, this is WELFARE for the rich!People usually say, "I don't support welfare because you're just giving money to lazy people."Well now those same people better be saying, "I don't support welfare because you're giving money to banks that were greedy to the American people and failed due to their own fucking greed!" Let these greedy fucks rot in Hell!McCain and Obama BOTH support these bailouts.Be smart with your vote, vote Bob Barr!!!
shanklinmike (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
Once again, you nailed it right on the head......History has shown us this is the way governments work 95% of the time!
710britt (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
The elite taking care of the elite
marxbitesall (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
The gen'l welfare clause was a do no harm clause just as much as it meant that any of govt's spending must benefit ALL citizens TOTALLY EQUALLY, like a battleship satisfies.The alternative is specific spending, like a "Bridges to Nowhere". Corrupt and illegal, and yet the progressive era corruptors of our constitution, a compact (contract), has been misconstrued to allow the finance of re-election spending, and not just mere battleships, but ever more wars & welfare - corp too.
InTheSticks1881 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
Thank you- Jim Rodgers
ls1z28chris (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
The "general welfare" clause is bullshit as it can be interpreted to mean anything.Our federal government's powers are specifically enumerated in the Constitution. I have no problem with states coming up with their own policies, but our federal government has no Constitutional mandate to "bailout" these two mortgage firms.
rphaigh (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
Ripping off one group for the benefit of another group is the opposite of the general welfare.
advancedatheist (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
Well, this pretty much blows up the fraud of modern "conservatism." |
