|
HurricaneHeidi (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
Go to "quatloos!" and use search words: "money inflation" and you will find the threads in which I support conservative economics, expose the legalized counterfeiting committed by the Fed, and tout Murray N. Rothbard. You can search "legalized counterfeiting" and "Rothbard" on quatloos! too. Seriously... I could use some help standing up against these hostile fools.
HurricaneHeidi (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
HELP!!! I've been holding my own against a tide of disinformation on a site called "quatloos" (my user name there is "Pantekhnikon"). I have been discussing Rothbard, Vieira, and the Austrian School's economic principles against deliberate ad hominem attack & disinformation by a group of Fed Res lackys. Quatloos is SUPPOSED 2 B dedicated to exposing financial SCAMS and FRAUDS, but their zombies called Murray Rothbard an "old troll" after I posted links 2 his lectures. Pls Help me debate them!
stealthpakfa (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
because the 9/11 planners were the people that own the federal reserve! u might want to look up the rothschild and rockefeller families! and how 9/11 made them wealthier and gained more control!
strata1972 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
no let's not copy anything the Chinese do. The American thing to do is drag them behind our big american pickup trucks!Seriously, only a attack on the main Federal Reserve buildingwill run them out of this land. Why couldn't the 911 hijackerschose the that building!
joseshema (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
We should take an example of what the Chinese would do when their own officials are caught taking from the system. The chopping block. There would be so many head rolling (literally) down the hall of congress that we would need to find a landfill for all of the corruption we disposed of.
j4ck2234 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
+I think we disagree with what happens when you abolish fraudulent banking. I guess you believe that average Joe would hoard his gold (or whatever) in his basement or in a depositary institution rather than direct it to the most profitable use. I'm sure rational self interest and free market functions would prevent that. We don't need inflation to counter 'hoarding'.
j4ck2234 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
I think we agree in the conclusion that todays banks are a big fraud and have nothing to do with market institutions.
j4ck2234 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
What you are describing is not possible on the free market. They're giving a fraudulent guarantee. You cannot guarantee money that you don't have, that would be illegal. But that doesn't mean that on a free market people couldn't socialize the use of their savings to keep them accesable while benefiting from interest.
j4ck2234 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
No, lending out money that you don't have is creating money. Lending out that 1$ a 100 times with the motive that those 100 people would not clear their deposits at the same time is creating money, not the actual transaction of a dollar. The guarantees certainly had to be adjusted, but why not socialize the use of savings in order to benefit from minimum risk loans?
j4ck2234 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)
Because it wouldn't work if you knew. |
